Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Henry
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:11Z
dc.date.issued2007-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3138
dc.identifier.contextkey2272290
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2522
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between property and morality has been obscured by three elements in our intellectual tradition. First is the assumption, which can be traced to Bentham, that property is a pure creature of law. An institution assumed to be wholly dependent on law for its existence is unlikely to be infused with strong moral content. Second is the related tradition, also Benthamite, of examining questions about property law from a utilitarian perspective. Utilitarianism is, of course, a moral theory. But in its modern applications, based on price theory and cost-benefit analysis, it adopts a framework largely indifferent to questions of individual rights and distributive justice, which many consider the hallmarks of a moral perspective. Third is the tradition, stronger perhaps in academic circles than in popular thought, that associates property with immorality. Starting with Proudhon's slogan that "property is theft,"' and building through Marx and Engels with their call for the abolition of private property,4 this tradition has put property on the defensive in the minds of those drawn to thinking of public policy in moral terms.
dc.titleThe Morality of Property
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:11Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3138
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4049&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Morality_of_Property.pdf
Size:
2.679Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record