Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Henry
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:41:10Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:41:10Z
dc.date.issued2006-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3137
dc.identifier.contextkey2272291
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2521
dc.description.abstractContractual boilerplate is a little like property. Such a statement might seem like a category mistake. After all, contractual boilerplate language is part of contracts, which, unlike property, are freely customizable by the parties. Contracts create rights between those parties, not against the world at large. Nor do people who devise new boilerplate terms usually have intellectual property in the provisions themselves.
dc.titleModularity in Contracts: Boilerplate and Information Flow
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:41:11Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3137
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4050&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Modularity_in_Contracts_Boiler ...
Size:
418.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record