Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTyler, Tom
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:30.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:40:48Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:40:48Z
dc.date.issued1992-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/3026
dc.identifier.contextkey2270413
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2399
dc.description.abstractA key Supreme Court decision regarding involuntary civil commitment hearings is Parham v. J.R. In Parham, the Supreme Court ruled that minors are not entitled to a hearing prior to involuntary admission into a state mental hospital because state psychiatrists, those otherwise responsible for making the admissions decision, could act as a "neutral factfinder."
dc.subjectThe Psychological Consequences of Judicial Procedures: Implications for Civil Commitment Hearings
dc.subject46 Southern Methodist University Law Review 433-448 (1992)
dc.titleThe Psychological Consequences of Judicial Procedures: Implications for Civil Commitment Hearings
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:40:48Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3026
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4038&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_psychological_consequences ...
Size:
920.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record