Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCorbin, Arthur
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:29.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:40:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:40:29Z
dc.date.issued1923-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2935
dc.identifier.citationArthur Corbin, Comment on Ward & Co. v. Commissioner of Taxes, (1923).
dc.identifier.contextkey2249132
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2298
dc.description.abstractThe law of England is not friendly to skyscrapers. Their erection may even involve a nuisance and bring their constructor within the rule of Rylands v. Fletcher. In Hoare & Co. v McAlpine & Sons (1922, Ch.) 39 T.L.R. 97, the defendant was engaged in excavating for new buildings expected to attain the immense height of 120 feet, "the highest buildings in the City except St. Paul's."
dc.titleComment on Ward & Co. v. Commissioner of Taxes
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:40:29Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2935
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3934&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Comment_on_Hoare___Co._v._McAl ...
Size:
65.61Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record