Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCorbin, Arthur
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:29.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:40:17Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:40:17Z
dc.date.issued1923-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2875
dc.identifier.contextkey2041383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2233
dc.description.abstractThe law of England is not friendly to skyscrapers. Their erection may even involve a nuisance and bring their constructor within the rule of Rylands v. Fletcher. In Hoare & Co. v. McAlpine & Sons (1922, Ch.) 39 T. L. R. 97, the defendant was engaged in excavating for new buildings expected to attain the immense height of 120 feet, "the highest buildings in the City except St. Paul's."
dc.titleComment on Hoare & Co. v. McAlpine & Sons
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:40:18Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2875
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3875&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Comment_on_Hoare___Co._v._McAl ...
Size:
65.61Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record