Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCorbin, Arthur
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:29.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:40:14Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:40:14Z
dc.date.issued1926-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2858
dc.identifier.citationArthur L Corbin, Assignment of contract rights, 74 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW AND AMERICAN LAW REGISTER 207 (1926).
dc.identifier.contextkey2032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2214
dc.description.abstractThis subject has been much discussed under the heading "alienability of choses in action." In continuing the discussion our first step should be to abandon altogether the term "chose in action." Its linguistic construction is faulty, in that its individual words lead one to think of something very different from that which the expression as a whole now denotes. There is no "chose" or thing or res. There is a right (or claim) against some person. In this article we shall speak in terms of rights (or claims) and not about "choses."
dc.titleAssignment of Contract Rights
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:40:14Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2858
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3848&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Assignment_of_Contract_Rights.pdf
Size:
1.343Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record