Civil Religion and Its Discontents
dc.contributor.author | Amar, Akhil | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:13.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:34:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:34:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1989-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/1024 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1668327 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/214 | |
dc.description.abstract | What does it mean to be an American? What (if any) "sacred ties" bind us together as a special people with a special destiny? And what is the proper place for quasi-religious icons, like the flag, and creedal affirmations, like the Pledge of Allegiance, in constituting ourselves as a special community? These timely questions have been sharply posed in recent months by the presidential campaign of George Bush, a proud, albeit adopted, son of the Lone Star state. But these questions are more than timely-they are timeless. Indeed, months before the general election took shape, these and related questions were posed with even more crispness-and with far more elegance, eloquence, and thoughtfuilnessby another adopted son of Texas, Professor Sanford Levinson. | |
dc.title | Civil Religion and Its Discontents | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:34:32Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1024 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2021&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |