Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchuck, Peter
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:28.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:39:57Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:39:57Z
dc.date.issued1994-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2765
dc.identifier.contextkey1950488
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2111
dc.description.abstractThe doctrine requiring physicians to obtain a patient's informed consent before undertaking treatment is relatively young, having first appeared in a recognizable, relatively robust form only in 1957. Yet the values that underlie the doctrine have an ancient pedigree. The consent norm had occupied a prominent and honored place in our legal thought for many centuries before the courts began to develop a jurisprudence of informed consent in health care. Also well established was the cognate notion that consent must be informed or knowledgeable in some meaningful sense if we are to accord it legal or moral significance.
dc.titleRethinking Informed Consent
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:39:57Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2765
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3807&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Rethinking_Informed_Consent.pdf
Size:
4.336Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record