Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalkin, Jack
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:27.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:39:47Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:39:47Z
dc.date.issued1994-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/271
dc.identifier.contextkey1607154
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2052
dc.description.abstractFor several years now I have been concerned with the problem of how one should apply the insights of deconstructive practice to questions of law and justice. This question is far from easy, although many people (in American legal theory, in particular) have simply assumed that deconstruction could readily be adapted to political questions and, in particular, to the political agenda of the left. The problem, however, is that deconstructive techniques do not seem to support any particular vision of justice; indeed they appear to preclude the possibility of any stable conception of the just or the good that could provide the basis for political belief or the authority for political action.
dc.titleBeing Just With Deconstruction
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:39:47Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/271
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1270&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Being_Just_With_Deconstruction.pdf
Size:
731.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record