Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCover, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:27.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:39:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:39:46Z
dc.date.issued1983-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2705
dc.identifier.contextkey1935792
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2047
dc.description.abstractThe normative universe is held together by the force of interpretive commitments - some small and private, others immense and public. These commitments - of officials and of others - do determine what law means and what law shall be. If there existed two legal orders with identical legal precepts and identical, predictable patterns of public force, they would nonetheless differ essentially in meaning if, in one of the orders, the precepts were universally venerated while in the other they were regarded by many as fundamentally unjust.
dc.titleThe Supreme Court, 1982 Term -- Foreword: Nomos and Narrative
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:39:47Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2705
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3690&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Nomos_and_Narrative.pdf
Size:
4.349Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record