The Uses of Jurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology and Innovation

dc.contributor.author	Cover, Robert
dc.date	2021-11-25T13:34:27.000
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-26T11:39:46Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-26T11:39:46Z
dc.date.issued	1981-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifier	fss_papers/2702
dc.identifier.contextkey	1936390
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/2044
dc.description.abstract	Instead of viewing the persistence of concurrency as a dysfunctional relic, one may hypothesize that it is a product of an institutIonal evolution. The persistence of the anomaly over time requires a search for a strong functional explanatIon. With such an approach, one makes the working assumption that the historical explanation of the origin of the structure of complex concurrency of jurisdiction, even if accurate, does not suffice to explain its persIstence. It is this approach that I shall pursue here.
dc.title	The Uses of Jurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology and Innovation
dc.source.journaltitle	Faculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA	2021-11-26T11:39:46Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2702
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3693&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1

Name:

The_Uses_of_Jurisdictional_Red ...

Size:

2.996Mb

Format:

PDF