Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlack, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:25.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:39:27Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:39:27Z
dc.date.issued1974-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2600
dc.identifier.citationCharles L Black Jr, The National Court of Appeals: An Unwise Proposal, 83 YALE LJ 883 (1973).
dc.identifier.contextkey1922763
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1932
dc.description.abstractA Study Group on the Case Load of the Supreme Court has recently made findings and very drastic recommendations.' If I did not know that some qualified persons do disagree with the main finding of the Group -the finding, in brief, that the Supreme Court either now is or (if its present pattern of doing business continues unchanged) shortly will be far too overworked to do its job well, or even passably-I should have thought this beyond debate or doubt. The statistics still seem to me to be of unrebutted grimness. I am going to assume here that this finding is right.
dc.titleThe National Court of Appeals: An Unwise Proposal
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:39:27Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2600
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3576&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
A_National_Court_of_Appeals.pdf
Size:
1.003Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record