Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlack, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:25.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:39:26Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:39:26Z
dc.date.issued1973-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2598
dc.identifier.contextkey1922808
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1928
dc.description.abstractAll aspects of the important Bremen decision will be explored in these Comments and elsewhere. I propose to present just two ideas, without needless connective verbal tissue between them: I. The Bremen case has nothing to do with the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA); both choice-of-forum and choice-of-Iaw clauses should continue to be invalidated in bills of lading subject to that Act. II. The best solution for international conflicts of interpretation as to COGSA (and doubtless as to other statutes based on international conventions) would be an international court of appeals, exercising a discretionary jurisdiction, but empowered to affirm or reverse the judgments of national courts on these points of interpretation.
dc.titleThe Bremen, COGSA and the Problem of Conflicting Interpretation
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:39:27Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2598
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3578&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Bremen__COGSA_and_the_Prob ...
Size:
639.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record