Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrilmayer, Lea
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:25.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:39:18Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:39:18Z
dc.date.issued1987-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2552
dc.identifier.contextkey1926906
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1879
dc.description.abstractConflict of laws scholars appear to be about the only ones concerned about what is going on in the evolving modern learning of interstate relations. By interstate relations, I am referring to problems of adjudicative jurisdiction, legislative jurisdiction, and enforcement of judgments. Although such relations are governed largely by state law, they are also affected by federal constitutional provisions such as the due process clause, the full faith and credit clause, and the commerce clause. These relations comprise the arcane field known as "conflict of laws," and constitute "the other" federalism issue; the first such issue being the relationship between the state and federal courts and legislatures.l
dc.titleInterstate Federalism
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:39:18Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2552
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3624&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Interstate_Federalism.pdf
Size:
1.500Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record