Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalkin, Jack
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:25.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:39:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:39:11Z
dc.date.issued2001-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/251
dc.identifier.citationJack M Balkin, Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics, 110 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL 1407 (2001).
dc.identifier.contextkey1599111
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1833
dc.description.abstractShortly after the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Bush v. Gore, one member of the majority, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, addressed a group of students in the Washington, D.C., area. He told them that he believed that the work of the Court was not in any way influenced by politics or partisan considerations. This speech was widely reported in the press. Afterwards the question on many legal scholars’ minds was not whether Justice Thomas had in fact made these statements. The question was whether he also told the students that he believed in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy.
dc.titleBush v. Gore and the Boundary Between Law and Politics
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:39:11Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/251
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1250&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Bush_v._Gore_and_the_Boundary_ ...
Size:
330.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record