The Role of Race, Poverty, Intellectual Disability, and Mental Illness in the Decline of the Death Penalty
dc.contributor.author | Bright, Stephen B. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-13T13:25:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-13T13:25:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | University of Richmond Law Review; Mar2015, Vol. 49 Issue 3, p671-692, 22p | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/18318 | |
dc.description.abstract | Capital punishment is a difficult and sensitive topic because it involves terrible tragedies, the murder of innocent people, loss and suffering, and the passions of the moment. It is used in only a very small percentage of cases in which it could be imposed and is currently in decline. Six states have recently abandoned it, and the number of death sentences imposed in the country decreased from over 300 per year in the mid-1990s to less than eighty in the last several years. And so it is appropriate for us to ask whether death remains an appropriate punishment in a modern society, whether it is fairly carried out without race and poverty influencing who dies, and whether it is imposed only upon the most incorrigible offenders who commit the most heinous crimes. | en_US |
dc.subject | Capital punishment sentencing; Cruel & unusual punishment; Dissenting opinions (Law); Life sentences; McCleskey v. Kemp | en_US |
dc.title | The Role of Race, Poverty, Intellectual Disability, and Mental Illness in the Decline of the Death Penalty | en_US |
rioxxterms.version | NA | en_US |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-07-13T13:25:51Z |