• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of openYLSCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Notes on Methods and Objectives in the Conflict of Laws: A Challenge

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Notes_on_Methods_and_Objective ...
    Size:
    506.4Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Brilmayer, Lea
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1830
    Abstract
    I believe that interest analysis is methodologically bankrupt, have said so in print, and have been criticized. In my view, Brainerd Currie had his own beliefs about how far statutes ought to reach in their multistate applications, and these beliefs were methodologically on a par with the maxims of the First Restatement. He should have defended the substantive wisdom of these tenets on the merits. But rather than doing so directly- by empirical evidence, for instance, or by moral reasoning-he sought to camouflage his preferences as effectuation of legisative policy goals. He then claimed that any judge who adhered to the old territorialist norms when the interest analysis norms required a different result was operating in an undemocratic manner and invading the domain of the legislature. Further, the judge was doing so in a manner that discouraged legislative revision or reformulation.
    Collections
    Faculty Scholarship Series

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.