Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalkin, Jack M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T00:20:01Z
dc.date.available2023-05-24T00:20:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWilliam & Mary Bill of Rights Journal; Dec2022, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p307-360, 54pen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/18262
dc.description.abstractMany arguments in constitutional law invoke collective memory. Collective memory is what a group-for example, a religion, a profession, a people, or a nation-remembers and forgets about its past.1 This combination of remembering and forgetting helps constitute the group's identity and structures its values and its commitments. Precisely because memory is selective, it may or may not correspond to the best account of historical facts.en_US
dc.publisherWilliam & Mary Bill of Rights Journalen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional law; Constitutional amendments; Lawyers; Judges; Collective memory;en_US
dc.titleCONSTITUTIONAL MEMORIESen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstracten_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-05-24T00:20:02Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Balkin.pdf
Size:
2Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record