Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDeer, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T15:48:51Z
dc.date.available2023-05-12T15:48:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/18251
dc.descriptionVol. 34.2:80en_US
dc.description.abstractWhat if every gendered legal issue was not burdened by over 200 years of patriarchal and racist precedent? How would feminists craft legal practices and structures in a way that would be grounded by a clear understanding of the harms of oppression and subjugation? These questions are not just rhetorical; this essay argues that a fresh perspective is possible in the context of an Indigenous feminist jurisprudence. Indigenous feminist legal theory (IFLT) is in its nascent stages as a contemporary academic discipline and praxis. It has largely been elucidated by legal scholars in Canada, including Emily Snyder, Val Napoleon, and John Borrows. Snyder explains that IFLT lies at the intersection of feminist legal theory, Indigenous feminist theory, and Indigenous legal theory.en_US
dc.titleFeminist Jurisprudence in Tribal Courts: An Untapped Opportunityen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstracten_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-05-12T15:48:52Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
80.pdf
Size:
1.610Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record