Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCable, Abraham J.B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-10T19:34:28Z
dc.date.available2022-11-10T19:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/18218
dc.descriptionVolume 39en_US
dc.description.abstractLegal scholars worry that existing laws cannot adequately regulate large private companies (“unicorns”). At the same time, unicorns seem to be a key part of flourishing markets. Are unicorns a problem that requires solving or a sign that entrepreneurial finance is working? This essay addresses that question by tracking outcomes for the 32 startups that qualified as unicorns when the moniker first emerged. It introduces a new typology of unicorn outcomes to guide policy makers and offers a preliminary hypothesis that private ordering by founders, employees, and investors is proving an effective alternative to ambitious regulatory reform.en_US
dc.titleTime Enough for Counting: A Unicorn Retrospectiveen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFOA2022-11-11T16:19:38Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2.-Bulletin.023-045.Cable_.Tim ...
Size:
381.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record