• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of openYLSCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Fuller vs. the American Legal Realists: An Intervention

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Fuller_vs._the_American_Legal_ ...
    Size:
    984.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    McDougal, Myres
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1813
    Abstract
    Some few years ago a distinguished literary critic, confronted with the conversion of many of his friends to the Communist faith, tried to put himself in the place of the educated Greek or Roman "who discovered with amazement that his most intimate friends were turning" to that "strange new delusion," Christianity. To the many law students who have drawn inspiration from the hardy and sophisticated realism of some of Professor Lon Fuller's earlier writings must be recommended a similar imaginative, propaedeutic exercise if they are to hope to avoid bewilderment and maintain equanimity when confronted with this latest, and most ambitious, of that quondam skeptic's essays in Jurisprudence. The paradox and mystery of The Law in Quest of Itself is not confined to its title. Designed to rescue a sterile contemporary American legal scholarship from the inhibiting influence of an "unseasonably positivistic" philosophy and, thereby, to encourage a "philosophic reexamination of basic premises" and a "more direct recourse to social and ethical desiderata," this astonishing little book seeks to achieve such specified ends by redefining "law" as a diaphanous confusion of is and ought. No small task this for a definition, whatever the definition and whatever the faith! The choice which we all—judges, lawyers, teachers, and students (and legislators and administrators?)—have to make, the choice which determines how we will spend our working days, is, as Professor Fuller sees and poses it, between "natural law" and "positivism." For him, however, this is really no choice at all; and what he offers the rest of us is equally a Hobson's choice: attacking and rejecting "positivism" as impossible nonsense, he goes off the deep end for "natural law." It becomes important, therefore, to try to determine what he means by these two highly ambiguous symbols and where his meaning, if ascertainable, will lead us. His general theory of "the meaning of meaning," of the relation between verbal and non-verbal events, may also become an inescapable subject of inquiry.
    Collections
    Faculty Scholarship Series

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.