Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMumford, Megan N.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:37.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:32:33Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:32:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierylsspps_papers/128
dc.identifier.contextkey15931166
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17748
dc.description.abstractAdministrative law scholars have explored how Congress designs overlapping agency authority to carry out complementary agency goals. While discussion of these overlaps is largely positive, what happens when Congress leaves an implicit overlap unaddressed? This Paper explores EEOC and NLRB’s overlapping authority over union sexual harassment claims to analyze whether implicit overlaps merit the same support. Unlike explicit overlaps, inattention to implicit overlaps can decrease transparency and efficiency, create procedural confusion, and lead to conflicting legal standards. The Paper assesses solutions by agencies, Congress, and courts, and explores unique separation of powers issues in addressing ambiguous jurisdictional overlap.
dc.titleMind the Overlap: Coordinating Implicit Overlaps in Agency Jurisdiction
dc.source.journaltitleStudent Prize Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:32:33Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylsspps_papers/128
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1129&context=ylsspps_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Overlapping_Agency_Authority.docx
Size:
128.0Kb
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007
Thumbnail
Name:
auto_convert.pdf
Size:
517.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record