Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWacholder, Jonah
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:36.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:32:31Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:32:31Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierylsspps_papers/121
dc.identifier.contextkey9383807
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17741
dc.description.abstractObergefell v. Hodges, holding that limitations of marriage to different-sex couples violate the Constitution, and similar state and federal decisions raise the question of whether states must, on the same logic, also recognize marriages with more than two partners. I take up this question in this paper, considering the legal arguments that have been made and adopted by courts for the constitutional invalidity of limiting marriage to different-sex couples, and how readily they apply to limiting marriage to two-person relationships. Because recognizing marriages with more than two partners likely requires restructuring the legal rights and duties attached to marriage, raising difficult questions of interpersonal fairness, I conclude that ultimately there is a strong basis for distinguishing the constitutional issues raised by the same-sex marriage cases from those raised by a hypothetical challenge to two-person-only marriage laws.
dc.titleWhat Does Obergefell Mean for Multiple-Partner Marriages?
dc.source.journaltitleStudent Prize Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:32:31Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylsspps_papers/121
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=ylsspps_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
What_Does_Obergefell_Mean_for_ ...
Size:
360.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record