What Does Obergefell Mean for Multiple-Partner Marriages?
dc.contributor.author | Wacholder, Jonah | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:36:36.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T12:32:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T12:32:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | ylsspps_papers/121 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 9383807 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17741 | |
dc.description.abstract | Obergefell v. Hodges, holding that limitations of marriage to different-sex couples violate the Constitution, and similar state and federal decisions raise the question of whether states must, on the same logic, also recognize marriages with more than two partners. I take up this question in this paper, considering the legal arguments that have been made and adopted by courts for the constitutional invalidity of limiting marriage to different-sex couples, and how readily they apply to limiting marriage to two-person relationships. Because recognizing marriages with more than two partners likely requires restructuring the legal rights and duties attached to marriage, raising difficult questions of interpersonal fairness, I conclude that ultimately there is a strong basis for distinguishing the constitutional issues raised by the same-sex marriage cases from those raised by a hypothetical challenge to two-person-only marriage laws. | |
dc.title | What Does Obergefell Mean for Multiple-Partner Marriages? | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Student Prize Papers | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T12:32:31Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylsspps_papers/121 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=ylsspps_papers&unstamped=1 |