Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNewland, Erica
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:36.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:32:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:32:29Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierylsspps_papers/112
dc.identifier.contextkey7752628
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17732
dc.description.abstractThis Note presents a study of judicial decisions that have engaged with executive orders. The study was designed to elucidate the contexts in which courts have considered executive orders; to identify the questions that courts have posed about executive orders; and to synthesize the doctrine that courts have developed in response to those questions. This study reveals that, although the executive order is a powerful tool of the presidency, courts have not tended to acknowledge, in a particularly theorized way, the special challenges and demands of the executive order as a form of lawmaking. This Note argues that, in the absence of a thicker jurisprudential conception of the executive order, doctrinal asymmetries that heavily favor executive power have emerged. These asymmetries carry costs and therefore merit closer attention.
dc.titleExecutive Orders in Court
dc.source.journaltitleStudent Prize Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:32:29Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylsspps_papers/112
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=ylsspps_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Newland.2099_xocajdzh.pdf
Size:
3.265Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record