Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlegre, Marcelo
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:34.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:31:32Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:31:32Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryls_sela/65
dc.identifier.contextkey3285623
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17564
dc.description.abstractAlthough for centuries conscientious objection was primarily claimed by those who for religious or ethical reasons refused to join the ranks of the military (whether out of a general principle or in response to a particular violent conflict), in recent decades a significant broadening of the concept can be seen. InThailand, for example, doctors recently refused medical attention to injured policemen suspected of having violently repressed a demonstration. In Argentina a few public defenders have rejected for conscientious reasons to represent individuals accused of massive human rights violations. In different countries all over the world there are doctors who refuse to perform euthanasia, schoolteachers who reject to teach the theory of evolution, and students who refuse to attend biology classes where frogs are dissected.
dc.subjectArgentina
dc.subjectbasic rights
dc.subjecthuman rights
dc.subjectright to health
dc.subjectsexual and reproductive rights
dc.subjectconscientious objection
dc.subjectcivil disobedience
dc.titleConscious Oppression: Conscientious Objection in the Sphere of Sexual and Reproductive Health
dc.source.journaltitleSELA (Seminario en Latinoamérica de Teoría Constitucional y Política) Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:31:33Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yls_sela/65
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=yls_sela&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
SELA09_Alegre_DC_Eng.pdf
Size:
126.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record