Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrosman, Lucas
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:34.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:31:31Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:31:31Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryls_sela/59
dc.identifier.contextkey3195486
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17557
dc.description.abstractSuppose the City of Buenos Airesplans to build a highway to allow us to travel faster within this congested metropolis. For this to be possible, the government must expropriate and knock down a number of houses. As we all know, eminent domain means that, in pursuit of a public purpose, government can take people’s property against their will. To use the terminology coined by Calabresi y Melamed,[1] in the face of eminent domain, the right to property of the owners of these houses is not protected by a property rule but by a liability rule: government has the power to buy this right compulsively in exchange for compensation. [1] See “Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability. A View of the Cathedral,” 85 Harv. L. Rev. 1089-1128 (1972).
dc.subject: property rights
dc.subjectbody as property
dc.subjectequivalence principle
dc.subjectcourt awarded damages
dc.subjectcompensation for harms
dc.subjectmoral damages
dc.subjectaccess/compensation trade off
dc.subjectvaluation of bodily injury
dc.titleThe Body as Property and the Problem of Damages
dc.source.journaltitleSELA (Seminario en Latinoamérica de Teoría Constitucional y Política) Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:31:31Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yls_sela/59
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=yls_sela&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
SELA08_Grosman_DC_Eng_20110729.pdf
Size:
72.39Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record