Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrilmayer, Lea
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:24.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:38:57Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:38:57Z
dc.date.issued2000-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2438
dc.identifier.citationLea Brilmayer, America: The World’s Mediator?, (2000).
dc.identifier.contextkey1914822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1754
dc.description.abstractThe end of the Cold War brought about a substantial restructuring ofmany aspects of the international political system, including its method for managing disputes. Under the Cold War's regime of bi-polarity, typically one of the "superpowers" would line up behind one participant to the dispute and the other "superpower" would line up behind the other. Bi-polarity frustrated dispute resolution because each of the disputing states would then have access to economic and military support, to the friendship of a permanent member of the Security Council, and to a network of alliances. The result, most commonly, was deadlock. The end of the Cold War seemed to bring hopes of avoiding such paralysis. The United States of America stepped into a new role, and as "the only remaining superpower" it took an increasingly active role in managing the disputes of other states.
dc.titleAmerica: The World’s Mediator?
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:38:57Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2438
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3440&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
America_The_World_s_Mediator.pdf
Size:
918.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record