America: The World’s Mediator?
dc.contributor.author | Brilmayer, Lea | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:24.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:38:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:38:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2000-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/2438 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lea Brilmayer, America: The World’s Mediator?, (2000). | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1914822 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1754 | |
dc.description.abstract | The end of the Cold War brought about a substantial restructuring ofmany aspects of the international political system, including its method for managing disputes. Under the Cold War's regime of bi-polarity, typically one of the "superpowers" would line up behind one participant to the dispute and the other "superpower" would line up behind the other. Bi-polarity frustrated dispute resolution because each of the disputing states would then have access to economic and military support, to the friendship of a permanent member of the Security Council, and to a network of alliances. The result, most commonly, was deadlock. The end of the Cold War seemed to bring hopes of avoiding such paralysis. The United States of America stepped into a new role, and as "the only remaining superpower" it took an increasingly active role in managing the disputes of other states. | |
dc.title | America: The World’s Mediator? | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:38:57Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2438 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3440&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |