Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFORMAN, JAMES
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:34.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:31:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:31:11Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryls_sela/110
dc.identifier.contextkey7533174
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17465
dc.description.abstractIn the last decade, a number of scholars have called the American criminal justice system a new form of Jim Crow. These writers have effectively drawn attention to the injustices created by a facially race-neutral system that severely ostracizes offenders and stigmatizes young, poor black men as criminals. I argue that despite these important contributions, the Jim Crow analogy leads to a distorted view of mass incarceration. The analogy presents an incomplete account of mass incarceration’s historical origins, fails to consider black attitudes toward crime and punishment, ignores violent crimes while focusing almost exclusively on drug crimes, obscures class distinctions within the African American community, and overlooks the effects of mass incarceration on other racial groups. Finally, the Jim Crow analogy diminishes our collective memory of the Old Jim Crow’s particular harms.
dc.subjectJim Crow
dc.subjectracism in the United States
dc.subjectmass incarceration
dc.subjectMichelle Alexander
dc.titleRACIAL CRITIQUES OF MASS INCARCERATION: BEYOND THE NEW JIM CROW
dc.source.journaltitleSELA (Seminario en Latinoamérica de Teoría Constitucional y Política) Papers
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:31:11Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yls_sela/110
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=yls_sela&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
SELA12_Forman_DC_Eng_20150819.pdf
Size:
95.56Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record