Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStilt, Edward
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:34.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:31:07Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:31:07Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-16T07:43:39-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol9/iss2/7
dc.identifier.contextkey7732346
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17449
dc.description.abstractThe Supreme Court has recently held in two cases that judicial elections are covered by section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and that trial judges are not exempt from the Act because they happen to hold "single person offices "-that is, exercise an authority independent of others who hold a similar office. The immediate, practical effect of the decision will be to remove a jurisdictional hurdle for the Blacks and Latinos who have suits pending in several states charging that multimember judicial elections violate section 2.
dc.titleVoluntary Constituencies: Modified At-Large Voting as a Remedy for Minority Vote Dilution in Judicial Elections
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:31:07Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol9/iss2/7
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1209&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19_9YaleL_PolyRev354_SpringSum ...
Size:
965.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record