Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeltont, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:31:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-15T08:48:14-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol8/iss2/4
dc.identifier.contextkey7723695
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17427
dc.description.abstractCongress enacted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to promote equality in the workplace. Congress clearly intended the Act to remedy intentional discrimination. The Act, however, remains silent about whether it is also concerned with facially neutral employment practices, adopted without a discriminatory motive, that adversely affect the employment opportunities of racial minorities and women. The legislative history of Title VII, as originally enacted, is inconclusive on this issue.
dc.titleThe Dismantling of the Griggs Disparate Impact Theory and the Future of Title VII: The Need for a Third Reconstruction
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:31:02Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol8/iss2/4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1184&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
16_8YaleL_PolyRev223_1990_.pdf
Size:
2.096Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record