Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRalstont, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:31:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-15T08:48:12-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol8/iss2/3
dc.identifier.contextkey7723669
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17426
dc.description.abstract"Neither our words nor our decisions should be interpreted as signaling one inch of retreat from Congress's policy to forbid discrimination in the private, as well as the public, sphere." Patterson v. McLean Credit Union,, 109 S. Ct. 2363, 2379 (1989). "Congress finds that ... in a series of recent decisions addressing employment discrimination claims under Federal law, the Supreme Court cut back dramatically on the scope and effectiveness of civil rights protections;" The Civil Rights Act of 1990, § 2 (a)(1), H.R. 4000, S. 2104, 101st Cong., 2d Sess. (1990).
dc.titleCourt vs. Congress: Judicial Interpretation of The Civil Rights Acts and Congressional Response
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:31:02Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol8/iss2/3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
15_8YaleL_PolyRev205_1990_.pdf
Size:
1.010Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record