Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrowdy, Michelle
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:31:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-15T08:48:00-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol8/iss1/8
dc.identifier.contextkey7723599
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17418
dc.description.abstractThis year, the next decennial United States census has begun. When the results of the new census are released, nearly every state may be forced to redraw the boundary lines defining its state and federal legislative districts. The goals and methods a state adopts for political redistricting pose important policy questions for the state. The location of the boundary lines will greatly influence the composition of the legislatures, and the new legislatures will, in turn, affect the direction of states for years into the future. Since the U.S. Supreme Court first held political redistricting to be justiciable in Baker v. Carr, t redistricting has been constrained by legal decisions defining constitutional requirements for drawing district lines. Political redistricting has thus become a question of law as well as policy.
dc.titleSimulated Annealing: An Improved Computer Model for Political Redistricting
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:31:00Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol8/iss1/8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1179&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
11_8YaleL_PolyRev163_1990_.pdf
Size:
908.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record