Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStone, Alan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:32.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:30:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:30:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-09T09:26:55-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol5/iss2/9
dc.identifier.contextkey7699569
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17353
dc.description.abstractIn its Spring 1985 issue, this Review published an article by Professors Mary L. Durham and John Q. La Fond attacking the use of therapeutically oriented criteria for involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill. In their article, Durham and La Fond sharply criticized such criteria in general and the American Psychiatric Association's 1983 Model State Law on Civil Commitment (the A.P.A. Model Law) in particular.
dc.titleBroadening the Statutory Criteria for Civil Commitment: A Reply to Durham and La Fond
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:30:46Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol5/iss2/9
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
24_5YaleL_PolyRev412_1986_1987_.pdf
Size:
861.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record