Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHungar, Thomas
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:32.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:30:43Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:30:43Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-08T12:01:59-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol5/iss1/9
dc.identifier.contextkey7693753
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17339
dc.description.abstractPlaintiffs who prevail in lawsuits claiming deprivation of civil rights are generally entitled to receive, in addition to relief for their actual injuries, an award of "reasonable" attorney's fees under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of 1976 (Fees Act or Act) or a similar fee-shifting statute. The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Evans v. Jeff D. , however, that settlement offers by defendants in such cases may be conditioned on plaintiffs' complete or partial waiver of attorney's fees, without violating the language or intent of the Fees Act.
dc.titleThe Ethics of Fee Waivers: Negotiation of Statutory Attorney's Fees in Civil Rights Cases
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:30:43Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol5/iss1/9
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
12_5YaleL_PolyRev157_1986_1987_.pdf
Size:
1.754Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record