Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLieberman, Hannah
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:30:26Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:30:26Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-23T09:02:04-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol35/iss1/8
dc.identifier.contextkey10063413
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17269
dc.description.abstractRules of civil procedure presuppose a level playing field where litigants have structured opportunities to develop and present their claims to a neutral fact­ finder. In millions of cases-the vast majority processed by state courts today­ the field is neither level nor fair. Instead, enormous numbers of small dollar value cases are disposed of mechanically, without meaningful adjudication. High-volume state court dockets involve serious asymmetries of power and knowledge, where plaintiffs' lawyers are able to manipulate or short-circuit the rules against unrepresented and generally unsophisticated low-income defendants.
dc.titleUncivil Procedure: How State Court Proceedings Perpetuate Inequality
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:30:26Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol35/iss1/8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1713&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Lieberman_Hannah.pdf
Size:
873.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record