Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLindell, Noah B.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:30:25Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-23T09:01:56-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol35/iss1/6
dc.identifier.contextkey10063410
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17267
dc.description.abstractWhat can the law do to improve teacher quality? In answering this question, one can be forgiven for thinking about regulation rather than litigation. At the federal level, most litigation-heavy education laws are antidiscrimination statutes, focused on protecting certain categories of students rather than on enforcing high teaching standards. Meanwhile, teacher quality has become a central aspect of education "policy" statutes. Lax teacher preparation standards and poor hiring policies, in particular, create challenges for the education sys­ tem. Good teachers not only increase students' scores on standardized tests; they also can lower students' teen pregnancy rates, increase their likelihood of going to college, and raise their lifetime incomes.
dc.titleOld Dog, New Tricks: Title VI and Teacher Equity
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:30:25Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol35/iss1/6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1711&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Lindell_Noah.pdf
Size:
2.445Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record