Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHendry, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorTatum, Melissa
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:30:21Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:30:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-06T14:35:34-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol34/iss2/3
dc.identifier.contextkey8809230
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17251
dc.description.abstractThere are three major problems with the use of the rights-based approach to tackle issues of Indigenous justice: It privileges (the worldview of) the dominant legal culture; It artificially restricts the conversation about causes of and solutions to problems of Indigenous justice; and It masks the inherent tension between human rights and legal pluralism. We explore the first of these problems in Part I by examining what is meant by a “rights-based approach,” how those ideas came into being, and how they differ from Indigenous conceptions. We address the second problem in Part II, which examines six representative U.S. cases and the patterns that can be derived from those cases. In Part III we turn to the third issue, which we operationalize in order to begin building possible solutions to the problem and possible alternate approaches to achieving justice for Indigenous people.
dc.titleHuman Rights, Indigenous Peoples, and the Pursuit of Justice
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:30:21Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol34/iss2/3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1699&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
3_hendry_tatum_final_copy.pdf
Size:
401.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record