Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHazard, Geoffrey
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:24.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:38:51Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:38:51Z
dc.date.issued1978-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2406
dc.identifier.contextkey1903092
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1719
dc.description.abstractIn his professional life David was mostly concerned with the procedure of litigation, particularly in the adversary system. He believed deeply in the adversary system as an expression of humane concerns, for he saw it as recognizing both the fallibility and the dignity of man. He also believed deeply in the idea of evidentiary privilege-that there are some things, indeed many things, in life that should not be open to public inspection, even for "good cause." It is therefore especially satisfying to say something in his memory about the attorney-client privilege, for that privilege involves an intersection of the mechanism of adjudication with the law of privacy.
dc.titleAn Historical Perspective on the Lawyer-Client Privilege
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:38:51Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2406
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3288&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Hist_y_Att_y_C.pdf
Size:
653.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record