Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRemus, Dana
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:29:59Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:29:59Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-10T13:40:08-08:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol30/iss1/4
dc.identifier.contextkey7931128
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17176
dc.description.abstractJudicial conduct, particularly judicial misconduct, has long drawn public attention and concern. In the past few years, media coverage has brought the issue to the forefront, highlighting a reality that the legal profession might prefer to avoid-that problematic judicial conduct frequently implicates lawyers. Recent news stories have reported interactions between judges and lawyers that are clearly prohibited by the codes of judicial conduct: They entail bribery, improper financial ties, and even improper sexual relationships. Recent reports have also covered problematic interactions between judges and lawyers that are not proscribed and are, in fact, encouraged by the codes of judicial conduct- codes that prohibit similar ties between judges and other private individuals. Perhaps unsurprisingly, these codes of judicial conduct, adopted in every state, are the product of a reform movement driven almost exclusively by the legal profession.
dc.titleJust Conduct: Regulating Bench-Bar Relationships
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:30:00Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol30/iss1/4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1622&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
05_30YaleL_PolyRev123_2011_201 ...
Size:
2.826Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record