Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZelinsky, Aaron
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:30.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:29:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:29:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-03T08:54:47-08:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol28/iss1/9
dc.identifier.contextkey7900694
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17116
dc.description.abstractThis Comment argues against extending the rule of noninquiry from extradition to removal cases. In removal cases where potential torture is alleged, courts should review removal determinations under a standard deferential to the executive.
dc.titleKhouzam v. Chertoff: Torture, Removal, and the Rule of Noninquiry
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:29:46Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol28/iss1/9
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1590&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10_28YaleL_PolyRev233_2009_201 ...
Size:
597.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record