Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDevlin, Alan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:30.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:29:45Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:29:45Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-03T08:54:39-08:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol28/iss1/3
dc.identifier.contextkey7897185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17110
dc.description.abstractHow should one construct optimal property rules in high-technology markets? The task is far from straightforward, given the prodigious rates of innovation in the field. In such a rapidly evolving environment, policymakers must approach many issues de novo. From an Internet service provider's desire to control activity on its servers to a pharmaceutical company's efforts to frustrate the emergence of generic drugs, lawmakers face an eclectic and ever-evolving array of scenarios. In the new economy, such fundamental concepts as ownership, exclusivity, and alienability prove controversial and unsettled. Ideally, policymakers could look to related areas of law for guidance. The most obvious candidate would be the law governing real property, but, at first blush, these traditional principles seem far removed from the reality of high-tech markets.
dc.titleIndeterminism and the Property-Patent Equation
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:29:45Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol28/iss1/3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1584&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
04_28YaleL_PolyRev61_2009_2010_.pdf
Size:
2.771Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record