Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSankaran, Vivek
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:30.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:29:33Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-20T08:38:44-08:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol25/iss1/3
dc.identifier.contextkey7866262
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/17059
dc.description.abstractCourts handling child abuse and neglect cases face a daunting task. Within one to three days after a child is removed from his home, a court hearing must be held to determine whether court intervention and continued removal of the child is necessary. At this hearing, the court must sort through and evaluate the state's allegations and assess the various risks posed by placing the child in foster care or returning the child to one or both of his parents. Courts must weigh the heavy emphasis the law places on preserving the family unit against the equally paramount mandate to keep the child safe at all Costs. Courts thus face a daunting choice: should they risk a child's safety by returning him to a potentially dangerous parent or place the child in foster care and risk rupturing the familial bond so important to a child's healthy development?
dc.titleOut of State and Out of Luck: The Treatment of Non-Custodial Parents Under the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:29:33Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol25/iss1/3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1533&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
05_25YaleL_PolyRev63_2006_2007_.pdf
Size:
2.167Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record