Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHutch, Daniel
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:29.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:29:14Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:29:14Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-12T08:17:18-08:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol20/iss2/8
dc.identifier.contextkey7831869
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16974
dc.description.abstractWhile Brown v. Board of Education marked the beginning of the end of de jure discrimination in American society, the decision did not lead to de facto equality for African-Americans, Hispanics, and members of other disadvantaged groups. Notwithstanding the efforts of distinguished jurists such as Judge A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., the economic disparities between blacks and whites actually increased in the aftermath of the Brown decision-especially for bluecollar workers.
dc.titleThe Rationale for Including Disadvantaged Communities in the Smart Growth Metropolitan Development Framework
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:29:14Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol20/iss2/8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1442&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19_20YaleL_PolyRev353_2002_.pdf
Size:
1015.Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record