Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReich, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:28.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:29:07Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:29:07Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-02T08:00:45-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol2/iss2/2
dc.identifier.contextkey7665944
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16945
dc.description.abstractPublic policy is seldom made by a process that permits and encourages adequate thinking. All too often, once a problem is recognized, there is an immediate leap to a specific proposed solution. Possible disadvantages of the proposed remedy are rarely weighed against expected advantages. The remedy is made to seem simple and noncontroversial when in fact it is neither. In some cases the causes of the problem may not have been correctly identified; in others, remedies are left undeveloped. The policy proposal is frequently made on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.' What is actually just one choice out of many is presented as if it were the only choice.
dc.titleConflicts Ahead On "The Next American Frontier"
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:29:08Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol2/iss2/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
14_2YaleL_PolyRev191_1983_1984_.pdf
Size:
723.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record