Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShuchart, Scott
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:28.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:29:05Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:29:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-10T11:49:28-08:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol19/iss2/9
dc.identifier.contextkey7828457
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16933
dc.description.abstractFederal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee, 213 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 2000), cert. granted, 121 S. Ct. 296 (2000) (00-191). The 2000 election marked a decisive step in the rebirth of political parties as the dominant force in American elections, thanks in no small part to increased rights won in the courts at the expense of federal election law. The only major election law still constraining party expenditures on races for Congress and the Senate was, midway through the campaign, struck down in the 10th Circuit; if, on its current appeal, the Supreme Court decides against the Federal Election Commission (FEC), parties will be free make unlimited expenditures on behalf of their candidates.
dc.titleSeeking Coherence in Doctrines of Party Election Expenditures
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:29:05Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol19/iss2/9
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1425&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
31_19YaleL_PolyRev515_2001_.pdf
Size:
589.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record