Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStark, Leonard
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:27.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:28:40Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:28:40Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-03T08:16:54-08:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol15/iss1/8
dc.identifier.contextkey7796623
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16828
dc.description.abstractThe 1996 California presidential primary was held on March 26, ten weeks earlier in the electoral calendar than California's June 1992 primary. New York's 1996 primary was held on March 7, a month earlier than the state's 1992 primary. These "great leaps forward" exemplify an important trend in the presidential nomination process: the increasing concentration of primaries and caucuses at earlier points in the nomination schedule. While just twelve percent of the delegates to the 1968 national nominating conventions were chosen before the beginning of April that year, in 1996 fully seventy-seven percent of the delegates had been chosen by the same point in the electoral calendar.
dc.titleThe Presidential Primary and Caucus Schedule: A Role for Federal Regulation?
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:28:40Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol15/iss1/8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1320&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
11_15YaleL_PolyRev331_1996_.pdf
Size:
4.020Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record