Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Matthew
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:27.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:28:28Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:28:28Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-22T08:59:46-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol12/iss2/2
dc.identifier.contextkey7752393
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16776
dc.description.abstractCivil forfeiture has enjoyed a long and varied history in both the United States and England, and has been the primary means by which government has attempted to protect its income from violations of customs and revenue laws. It has also been used as a means of enforcing consumer protection laws, most particularly those contained in various food and drug acts. Civil forfeiture has even played a part in furthering America's foreign policy aims, putting teeth in the nation's several attempts to enforce neutrality or embargo acts.'
dc.titleRethinking In Rem: The Supreme Court's New (and Misguided) Approach to Civil Forfeiture
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:28:28Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol12/iss2/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1268&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
14_12YaleL_PolyRev281_1994_.pdf
Size:
4.736Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record