Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalsich, Peter
dc.date2021-11-25T13:36:27.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:28:27Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:28:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-22T08:04:22-07:00
dc.identifierylpr/vol12/iss1/6
dc.identifier.contextkey7752329
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16771
dc.description.abstractAmid the cacophony of the Clinton Administration's first year, quiet steps were taken to transform federal housing policy. Two popular housing programs, tax-exempt housing revenue bonds and low-income housing tax credits, were extended permanently in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. Tax-exempt housing revenue bonds have been the mainstay of a remarkable growth in state housing-finance programs in the past twenty years. The low-income housing tax credit, the only active federal housing production subsidy program, is administered by many of the same state housing agencies that issue tax-exempt housing revenue bonds. The congressional decision to give permanent status to these two programs is evidence of a growing confidence in the ability of states to be the primary managers of federal housing policy.
dc.titleUrban Housing: A Strategic Role for the States
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law & Policy Review
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:28:27Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol12/iss1/6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1263&context=ylpr&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
09_12YaleL_PolyRev93_1994_.pdf
Size:
3.027Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record