Urban Housing: A Strategic Role for the States
dc.contributor.author | Salsich, Peter | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:36:27.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T12:28:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T12:28:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-10-22T08:04:22-07:00 | |
dc.identifier | ylpr/vol12/iss1/6 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 7752329 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/16771 | |
dc.description.abstract | Amid the cacophony of the Clinton Administration's first year, quiet steps were taken to transform federal housing policy. Two popular housing programs, tax-exempt housing revenue bonds and low-income housing tax credits, were extended permanently in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. Tax-exempt housing revenue bonds have been the mainstay of a remarkable growth in state housing-finance programs in the past twenty years. The low-income housing tax credit, the only active federal housing production subsidy program, is administered by many of the same state housing agencies that issue tax-exempt housing revenue bonds. The congressional decision to give permanent status to these two programs is evidence of a growing confidence in the ability of states to be the primary managers of federal housing policy. | |
dc.title | Urban Housing: A Strategic Role for the States | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Yale Law & Policy Review | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T12:28:27Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol12/iss1/6 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1263&context=ylpr&unstamped=1 |