Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHazard, Geoffrey
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:24.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:38:38Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:38:38Z
dc.date.issued2004-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2336
dc.identifier.citationGeoffrey C Hazard Jr, Announcement by Federal Judicial Nominees, 32 HOFSTRA L. REV. 1281 (2003).
dc.identifier.contextkey1906160
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1641
dc.description.abstractThe Supreme Court's decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White has understandably caused consternation among the American judiciary and legal profession. The principal concern aroused, apart from the holding itself, is whether restrictions may validly be imposed on judges and judicial candidates on forms of speech other than speeches in judicial election campaigns. Speeches by the candidates in judicial election campaigns was the issue immediately involved in White and I will have a few observations regarding that issue.
dc.title“Announcement” by Federal Judicial Nominees
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:38:38Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2336
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3364&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
_Announcement__by_Federal_Judi ...
Size:
546.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record