• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty Scholarship Series
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of openYLSCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Tax Reform and Tax Simplification

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Tax_Reform_and_Tax_Simplificat ...
    Size:
    847.0Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Bittker, Boris
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1587
    Abstract
    Neither "tax simplification" nor its mirror image, complexity, is a concept that can be easily defined or measured. I know of no comprehensive analytic framework for these ideas, nor are there any empirical studies supplying a "simplicity index" of particular areas of tax law and practice. Journalists often ridicule the Internal Revenue Code by pointing to lengthy involuted provisions and to definitions that refer the reader to other definitions that in turn compel him to go even farther afield. A favorite example is the 554-word sentence that makes up Section 341(e)(I). But these statutory intricacies may in fact be of minor importance, if they are addressed to tax experts concerned with transactions that rarely occur; and they may even clarify the law, despite their initially baffling phraseology. Sections 671-675, for example, are intricate provisions. As compared with the pre-1946 law governing income-splitting trusts, however, their message is crystalclear. The statutory language was simpler in earlier years, but the taxpayer and his adviser had to weigh the implications of hundreds of judicial decisions, most of which simply announced that all of the relevant facts and circumstances were to be weighed in determining whether the income of a trust was taxable to the grantor or to its trustee and beneficiaries. The 1945 regulations and 1954 statutory rules that replaced these judicial decisions were complex, but they made it much easier to find one's way through the wilderness. On the other hand, elaborate statutory verbiage can be a source of complexity and an obstacle to simplification; I will offer some instances later in this paper.
    Collections
    Faculty Scholarship Series

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.